Thursday, 4 October 2012

Celebrity culture and its positive and negative influence over our lives




Fame and being famous has well and truly changed over the years. In 2012, it is becoming increasingly harder to see or understand what defines a celebrity. As individuals have greater access to delve into the lives of the so-called elite at the touch of button. Back forty years or so a celebrity was acknowledged as someone who did something that they should be recongised from a great sporting achievement or not producing hit songs, a well known celebrity band back 35-40 years were the Beatles. Compare the well-deserved popularity of the Beatles with global media empire, The Kardashian who are famous for…well we are all not really sure. Regardless of that the Kardashian name is well known around the world as a family that has transformed their persona and has been successful in their entrepreneurial skills, to thus create and launch themselves as celebrities. The culture of celebrities is now decreasing as empires such as the Kardashian are bringing down the status. The issue of privacy is another concept of celebrity culture that is important to recongise but although yes everyone should we entitled to their own privacy when it comes to celebrities calling for privacy after they post, tweet and upload till they are blue in the face. These actions are calling or rather demanding the attention of the general public. So when it is that it becomes to far for celebrities? Should they be able to click their fingers and momentarily forget their existence and influence over our lives..

The most obvious known example that incorporates celebrities using their entrepreneurial skills to create and establish what is known renounced as a global media empire. It’s the Kardashian clan. Love them or hate them, they are everywhere and have stuck gold it terms of launching themselves as global empire. How did they do it though.. They definitely would have struggled without the access and influence of Television and social media to promote themselves. With a television show and several spin off  shows that depict the Kardashian’s in their everyday life, the insight we have is pretty outstanding. Not to mention if you are lucky enough to be following one of the Kardashian’s on twitter or instagram where you receive daily updates of what they have been doing and a photo to match. In this respect social media has helped platform the Kardashians into multi-million dollar stars, as all aspects of social media and mass media have worked in harmony in their creation.

                                                         Kardashian women 

As now the Internet, technology and social media have helped created celebrities from average people that walk down the street, take a video of them and post it on youtube and on some accounts turn into over night celebrities that have there 15 minutes of fame. But these ‘celebrities’ are a bad influence; firstly they encourage adolescents and children to participate in harmful or dangerous stunts to gain attention, just like they did. An example of this is Jackass- A TV show where they perform dangerous stunts to entertain the audience.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyYfimukl88

Or another alternative which paints these celebrities as role models, is a TV show like ‘the city’ where un realistically show the lives of elite socialites and display this as the way to live.

 The bad press that some celebrities receive can also be considered as portraying a bad influence their younger admirers. As Marshall states [2010] there is no denying that people are strongly influenced by celebrities in modern society and celebrity is a construction of a personal persona that is presented publicly. Not all celebrities receive bad press but they bring the others down as the accomplishments of great sportsman/women are lost when an ‘airhead’ celebrity gets her sex tape realised. Not to mention the police involvement that is increasingly being linked to celebrity. Where it is driving while heavily under the influence or a drug related offence, celebrity crime is at all time high. There is no denying that a link will draw between young teens who idolize these stars that have broken the law and been convicted. Which definitely has the potential to increase teen’s erratic behavior because if they see their role models and idols taking part in such activities they will see it as more of a reason to as well. This is backed up by several sources that state Celebrities need to change the way they act and how they are viewed, as their actions have more of an effect on us then many people believe they have.[Gauna 2012]

Mugshot of well known actress Lindsay Lohan after she was caught drink driving in 2010


As these individuals are so often defined as role models, people that children look up to respect and based them on. Some of these celebrities with no real talent, why is it okay for them to act inappropriately and influence younger generations of people. Are they aware they have this much power and influence. Psychiatrist Joseph Burgo [2010] breaks down the reasoning for the obsession and fascination with celebrities as two psychological forces working together- Idealization and envy. Individuals want to see celebrities as privileged people that lead the ideal life, a life without pain and frustration and full of excitement. This is why we place them on such a pedestal.

A part of being a celebrity is opening yourself to the world, whether you want to or not, it’s practically a requirement of the job. Some see this as the ‘downside’ of being a celebrity; personally I think that celebrities should deal with it. As it is the aspect that lets you deeply connect with your audience. Social media has had a huge influence over allowing celebrities to build a persona and ‘in this digital era, it is not difficult to find information about celebrities no matter how personal or private.’[Wright 2012]. There have been reports of stars personal address being posted on gossip columns… is this too far?


Regardless of what is said celebrities have existed and will continue to exist in our society. They will remain on the pedestal they are put on when they enter the world of fame and unfortunately for them the only way is down. So one day if they were to make a mistake the whole world will watch them fall. This fall will negatively affect the persona they have created for themselves and the millions of fans that worship them. To be a celebrity you have to be well recongised and to a certain extent have a ‘fan club’. If the fans follow you in your demise then you’ve landed yourself on the bad influence list. Alternatively if they haven’t have you lost your fans, and thus fame?
Whether it’s a 72 day marriage that gets our attention or a drink driving incident, as a celebrity they can’t be exempt from attention when something wrong is done. They also must realize the impact that what they do affects and influences their followers. But irrespective of the wrong doings there is something idealistic and fascinating about celebrity culture, it is a culture that will continue to affect the society and individuals.

Burgo, J, 2010, After Psychotherapy, ‘celebrities- why we love and hate them’ <http://www.afterpsychotherapy.com/celebrities/>

Gauna, A, 2012, ‘negative influence celebrities on teens’,

Marshall, P 2010, ‘The Specular Economy’, vol. 47, no. 6, pgs. 1-6, retrieved 31 August, Academic Search Complete, <http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy-m.deakin.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6bc3f301-1658-4cc3-9ee2-02d7f530d40e%40sessionmgr4&vid=2&hid=2>  

Wright, S, 2012, ‘Blinding lights: Negative effects of the media on celebrities’, <http://www.calpoly.edu/~gkeyclub/SeniorProject.pdf>
 
 IMAGE SOURCES:

Kardashian photo:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/how-kardashians-made-65-million-100349?page=show

Lohan photo:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-lindsay-lohan-mugshot-collection

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

Celebrity or internet star ?


The impact that celebrities have these days is ever increasing among all age groups. Recently however what is defined as a celebrity is slowing changing as a result of the Internet and globalisation, but do these ‘internet stars’ fall under the celebrity category. A prime example of this is how, an individual can record a video of them singing a song put it on Youtube and over night become a celebrity.


The above link shows a 12 year old boy- Greyson Chance, who virtually over night became an internet star after he posted a video of his rendition of Lady Gaga’s ‘Paparazzi’. The video clip was seen by more than 20 million people and lead him to be invited onto Ellen Degeners talk show, where he performed and thus signed onto Degeners record label. But do you see Chance as purely a star of the internet or a celebrity?

Be you an internet star or a celebrity there is a downside.. or what most people think is a downside.. The Paparazzi, everywhere you go watching your every move waiting for you to crack. Singer/Song writer Britney spears was a celebrity that let the pressure of the industry get to her. In 2008 she hit rock bottom, blaming the paparazzi for pushing her into having a mental breakdown- the constant pursuit for photos of her to a rapid downward spiral, which to the loss of custody of her two children.


Despite this obvious negative of being a celebrity the desire is still great. ‘People want so badly to become celebrities that they’ll take as their model the talentless nobodies they worshipped in there youth’. [Di Giovanna 1996]

References: 

Di Giovanna 1996, High Noon on the Electronic Frontier: Conceptual Issues in Cyberspace, ‘Losing your voice on the internet’ – PG 449. edited by Peter Ludlow

Identity and internet persona's



In todays world you can change, manipulate, create an alternate or even 'better version of yourself', through online means. Via the internet you can create a whole new persona- be whoever you want to be and say [to an extent] what you wish to say. 

Is this healthy? The Internet is becoming an outlet for people’s thoughts, feelings and emotions- more now than ever before, and the age groups are increasingly getting younger. As recent figures show 19% of young American teenagers have created a blog. [Bell 2002] A blog is an outlet whereby you can express feelings in an online forum and have control over the feedback you receive.  But there are obvious downsides to becoming to involved or obsessed with an Internet persona. Some individuals from a young age live and breathe the world of the net but this however is extremely unhealthy for them in more ways than one.



An Individual identity is formed through real life experiences and relationships formed with other people.  It is alternatively based on ‘how people acquire and make meaning in social life’. This is something that the Internet and in turn social media cannot provide. Although you may have 1000 friends on Facebook, this doesn’t compare to actual interaction with them. There this draws the line of difference between an individual’s identity and there Internet persona.

References:
Albert, Ashforth, Dutton, 2000, 'Organization identity identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges', PG 14

Bell, B 2007, ‘Private writing in public spaces: girls’ blogs and shifting boundaries’, Growing up online: young people and digital technologies 2007, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, N.Y, pp. 98-100

Photo reference:
Solo guy: http://singlemindedwomen.com/blog/sex-the-single-woman-is-an-online-dater-a-deal-breaker/

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Al-Jazzera & his impact


Culture is a huge part of any country, how the culture has grown through globalisation and or other means helps to define a country. You can see how countries culture's differ through looking at film, food or media.

Middle eastern culture: hard to define consistently through all countries in the middle east. But these countries are drawn together through a 'belief in islam, use of the Arabic language, connections through Arab league and historical ties' [Berich, 2012]. El Naway describes to us that the Arabic populations main priority is to save up enough money to purchase a satellite disc so as to watch figure head Al-Jazzera, although the news and information they are recevinging via this disc is noted to be extremely unreliable- they are still obsessed with the idea of following his news. Some households even put purchasing a satellite disc above daily needs. They are obsessed with 78.2% of the population tuning in. [El-Naway, M. 2003]. Much different to that of a developed and westernised country such as Australia.

Australia culture is according to wikipedia 'essentially a western culture influenced by the unique geography of the Australia continent'. Australia's culture has been heavily influenced by globalisation, we have a wider access to information and news than ever more. Within the Australia culture there is an ever increasing amount of 'digital journalism' which countries in the middle east don't have access too. The idea of digital journalism and the idea that the newspapers are slowly dying out in a australia is reflected through looking how Australia's culture has changed over the years.

References: 
Berich 2012, 'We reach all corners of the Globe', LLC, http://www.berichllc.com/html/middle_eastern_culture.html, Pg 1,

El-Nawawy, M. 2003, ‘The battle for the Arab mind’, Al-Jazeera, the story of the network that is rattling governments and redefining modern journalism 2003, Westview Press, Boulder CO, pp. 45-69, 217-218

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_Australia